Doctrine

Public specification of interpretive governance

Public normative specification of interpretive governance: perimeter, scope, compliance rules, and canonical artifacts.

EN FR
CollectionDoctrine
TypeSpecification
Layertransversal
Version1.0
Levelnormatif
Stabilization2026-02-01
Published2026-02-21
Updated2026-03-09

Public specification of interpretive governance

Public specification. This page constitutes the normative specification of interpretive governance. It defines the perimeter, scope, minimum compliance rules, and structuring artifacts of the corpus. It is neither a pedagogical page nor an analytical article, but a formal declaration of framework.

Status: Versioned public artifact
Scope: Machine interpretation (open web and closed environments)
Version: 1.0
Stabilization date: 2026-02

1. Perimeter

Interpretive governance governs:

  • the canonical definition of concepts;
  • the management of interpretive drifts;
  • the relation between canon and inference;
  • the sustainability of semantic artifacts.

It does not cover:

  • advertising optimization;
  • unstructured visibility marketing;
  • algorithmic manipulation.

2. Semantic authority

The canonical source of meaning is located exclusively in /definitions/. No clarification, analysis, or framework may modify a canonical definition without formal revision of that definition.

3. Layered structure

The corpus is structured according to the following hierarchy:

  • Doctrine
  • Canonical definitions
  • Operational frameworks
  • Clarifications
  • Applications

See: Ontological architecture.

4. Versioned artifacts

The following elements must be versioned:

  • canonical definitions;
  • operational frameworks;
  • matrices and protocols.

A substantial modification implies a version update, a stabilization date, and public traceability when relevant.

5. Minimum compliance

To be considered compliant with this specification, a corpus must:

  • declare its canonical definitions explicitly;
  • distinguish definition, method, and application;
  • make the relations between layers explicit;
  • avoid implicit redefinition of a term outside its canonical page.

6. Limits

This specification does not guarantee:

  • the absence of hallucination in external models;
  • the compliance of third-party engines;
  • the stability of environments outside direct control.

It defines only the internal governance framework of the published corpus.