Interpretive configurations of IIP-Scoring™
IIP-Scoring™ should not be read as a single scalar truth. It must be interpreted through configurations that describe how the system relates to the canon, to perimeter constraints, and to response conditions.
A configuration is therefore not a score. It is a governed reading regime for the score and its evidence.
Why configurations matter
The same numerical signal can correspond to different realities: perimeter omission, authority drift, weak traceability, unstable activation, or governed abstention. Configurations prevent the score from becoming a flattened verdict.
Minimum configurations
- anchored configuration: the answer remains inside the canon and preserves explicit bounds;
- drift configuration: the answer remains plausible but moves away from the canonical perimeter;
- silence configuration: the correct outcome is a legitimate non-response or a clarification request;
- instability configuration: the answer changes materially across prompts or contexts.
Operational consequence
Configurations make IIP-Scoring readable in governance terms. They tell whether the issue concerns fidelity, authority, perimeter, stability, or abstention — not merely whether the result is numerically high or low.