Page

Applicable frameworks

Registry of applicable frameworks derived from interpretive governance doctrine: agentic (open web and closed environments), endogenous and exogenous governance, interpretive debt, entity collisions, response conditions, citations, and interpretive fidelity.

EN FR
CollectionPage
TypeHub

Visual schema

Implementation chain

A framework converts doctrine into protocol, then method, then usable instrumentation.

01

Doctrine

What must hold inside the frame.

02

Framework

The intermediate operational frame.

03

Protocol

Sequence or discipline of application.

04

Measurement

Observability, score, audit, proof.

05

Usage

Concrete deployment in an environment.

Frameworks and applicable frameworks

Public registry of frameworks derived from the interpretive governance doctrine developed by Gautier Dorval.

This page serves as an internal linking hub to connect operational frameworks (/frameworks/) to canonical concepts (/definitions/) and doctrine (/doctrine/). Each framework is an application surface: it makes mechanisms usable, auditable, and enforceable.

For the lexical registry, see Definitions and canonical concepts. For the doctrinal table, see Doctrine. For field analyses, see Interpretive phenomena.



Projection rule

The frameworks in this registry are application surfaces. When a concept is defined in /definitions/ and formalized in /doctrine/, doctrine constitutes the canonical source and the framework acts as a structured projection designed to be usable in real context.

In case of perceived discrepancy between a framework and a doctrinal page, the doctrinal page prevails.


Associated articles (phenomena)

Frameworks are fed by analyses published in Interpretive phenomena. Reference series:


Authority and scope

Author:
Gautier Dorval

Scope:
Interpretive governance, agentic (open web and closed environments), semantic stabilization, response conditions, auditability, enforceability, variance reduction, entity disambiguation, interpretive debt, interpretive sustainability.

Primary language:
French (Canada). English versions may exist as equivalents, without modifying canonical meaning.

For contextual framing, see Positioning.

Canonical repo: https://github.com/GautierDorval/interpretive-seo

In this section

Enforceable response conditions for AI agents

Canonical framework: respond, refuse, stay silent, redirect, escalate. Enforceable conditions based on perimeters, source hierarchy, inference prohibitions, and auditability.

Framework
Typology of interpretive drifts in agentic systems

Canonical framework of interpretive drifts in agentic systems: silent extrapolation, moral hallucination, unjustified refusal, paternalistic redirection, false audit. Audit and interpretive governance grid.

Framework
CTIC: cross-layer transactional coherence

CTIC defines the minimum coherence required across interpretive, governance, and execution layers when a state change or transactional effect is involved.

Framework
Interpretive debt: analytical framework

Analytical framework for identifying, classifying, and monitoring interpretive debt as the accumulation of unresolved distortions in an interpreted web.

Framework
RAG governance: retrieval and inference control

Framework for governing retrieval-augmented systems so that retrieval does not silently substitute for canon and inference does not exceed the authorized perimeter.

Framework
RAG governance vs interpretive governance

Framework explaining why RAG governance is not equivalent to interpretive governance and why the latter remains broader than retrieval architecture.

Framework

Strategic external references

These references extend the doctrine, the test suite, the manifest, and the related public corpora.